Agentic AI Backbone The infrastructure agents run on

Conviction / Power and Physical Layer

VST

Vistra Corp.

82

conviction

Vistra sells electricity from a large fleet of gas and nuclear plants and has signed twenty year supply contracts with Amazon and Meta. Its profit forecast does not yet count those contracts or a pending $4 billion acquisition, while the shares have fallen roughly a third and now trade near their low for the year.

What we judge

Conviction 82

The view on expected return from here, 0 to 100.

How essential it is 80

Whether the thesis could succeed without this company at all. This moves slowly, and only when the company's position genuinely changes.

What we measure

Facts from market data, not judgments.

Price $141.34
30-day move -9.2%
Position in 52-week range 10
From the 52-week high -35.7%
Average daily volume $606.5M

Why it is in the fund

Thesis

Power generation company benefiting from surging AI data center electricity demand.

Standing judgment

About 36% off the high and only about 6% above the 52-week low, down 10.2% in thirty days and below both the 50 and 200 day averages. That is the worst momentum in the fund. Q2 lands 2026-08-07, and the shared PJM and FERC colocation overhang is the same one weighing on CEG.

What changed, and why

Every move in this number carries the reason it moved. A score does not change without new evidence.

DateConvictionChange CauseEvidence
2026-08-05 82 +6 Cheapest name in the power bucket at 10.3x EV/EBITDA on a guide that excludes both the Cogentrix acquisition and the signed Meta contracts, but the most recent evidence is a reaffirmation rather than a raise and the print is two days away. Q1 2026 reaffirmed FY26 adjusted EBITDA of $6.8-$7.6B and adjusted free cash flow before growth of $3.925-$4.725B, with a 2027 midpoint opportunity of $7.4-$7.8B. Both figures exclude the $4B Cogentrix acquisition, about 5.5 GW across ten gas plants, signed 2025-12-31 and still not closed as of toda
2026-08-05 76 flat first v3 judgment (v2 score was uninformative, see L-001): Reaffirmed guidance that deliberately excludes a $4.7B acquisition and signed hyperscaler contracts, against a 35% drawdown, means the market is paying less for more contracted earnings than it was a year ago. FY26 guidance reaffirmed at $6.8-$7.6B adjusted EBITDA and $3.925-$4.725B adjusted FCF before growth, excluding Cogentrix ($4.7B, pending) and the Meta PPAs. 20 year PPA with Amazon Web Services for nuclear supply; 20 year PPAs covering more than 2,600 MW of zero carbon output across three nuclear p
2026-08-05 76 +33 first v3 judgment (v2 score was uninformative, see L-001): Reaffirmed guidance that deliberately excludes a $4.7B acquisition and signed hyperscaler contracts, against a 35% drawdown, means the market is paying less for more contracted earnings than it was a year ago. FY26 guidance reaffirmed at $6.8-$7.6B adjusted EBITDA and $3.925-$4.725B adjusted FCF before growth, excluding Cogentrix ($4.7B, pending) and the Meta PPAs. 20 year PPA with Amazon Web Services for nuclear supply; 20 year PPAs covering more than 2,600 MW of zero carbon output across three nuclear p
2026-07-31 43 +3 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-30 40 +18 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-29 22 flat migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-28 22 -34 ⚠️ v2 rank-normalization artifact, unexplained move v2 `scores` row
2026-07-27 56 +15 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-26 41 -27 ⚠️ v2 rank-normalization artifact, unexplained move v2 `scores` row
2026-07-25 68 -4 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-24 72 -6 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-23 78 +2 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-22 76 -4 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-21 80 +8 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row
2026-07-20 72 +16 migrated from v2 (cause not recorded) v2 `scores` row